Activities of "michael.sudnik"

• ABP Framework version: v4.0.1
• UI type:MVC
• DB provider: MongoDB
• Tiered (MVC) or Identity Server Seperated (Angular): yes
• Exception message and stack trace:
• Steps to reproduce the issue:

If I choose a display language that has a different date format (e.g. en-gb), then the time-ago is calculated incorrectly within the entity change history widget view component.

The {entityChange.ChangeTime} needs to be replaced by {entityChange.ChangeTime:o} to ensure that it is rendered in the ISO 8601 format, regardless of which culture is being used.

Mike

• ABP Framework version: v4.0.1
• UI type: MVC
• DB provider: MongoDB
• Tiered (MVC) or Identity Server Seperated (Angular): yes
• Exception message and stack trace:
• Steps to reproduce the issue:

I have found that after creating around 20 organization units, it now takes a while (5 seconds) to open the create / edit user modal dialog. After some investigation, it seems to be the following lines

                        @for (var i = 0; i < Model.OrganizationUnits.Length; i++)
                        {
                            <input asp-for="@Model.OrganizationUnits[i].IsAssigned">
                            <input asp-for="@Model.OrganizationUnits[i].DisplayName" />
                            <input asp-for="@Model.OrganizationUnits[i].Id" />
                        }

I replaced this with the following and it is now is back down to less than a second to open the dialogs.

                        @for (var i = 0; i < Model.OrganizationUnits.Length; i++)
                        {
                            <input type="hidden" id="OrganizationUnits_@(i)__Id" name="OrganizationUnits[@(i)].Id" value="@Model.OrganizationUnits[i].Id">
                            <input type="hidden" id="OrganizationUnits_@(i)__IsAssigned" name="OrganizationUnits[@(i)].IsAssigned" value="@Model.OrganizationUnits[i].IsAssigned.ToString()">
                        }

I have excluded the DisplayName input as we did not need that.

Is it something to do with dialogs? Or the asp-for tag helper and the associated extra generated validation properties? I am not able to delve into the cause of the performance difference, but maybe you could investigate it?

Best regards,

Mike

• ABP Framework version: v4.0.1
• UI type: MVC
• DB provider: MongoDB
• Tiered (MVC) or Identity Server Seperated (Angular): yes
• Exception message and stack trace:
• Steps to reproduce the issue:

Can you let me know the status of the CMS kit? Has it been released and is it stable? Is it your intention to release it and document it? There is nothing in the documentation yet.

We are looking at creating a simple internal user voice type system to track feedback and ideas.

Many thanks, Mike

• ABP Framework version: v4.0.1
• UI type: MVC
• DB provider: MongoDB
• Tiered (MVC) or Identity Server Seperated (Angular): yes
• Exception message and stack trace:
• Steps to reproduce the issue:

There is no authorize attribute on the IdentityUserAppService.GetAvailableOrganizationUnitsAsync() method, which would allow any unauthenticated user to discover the OU structure!

Maybe there are also other cases where this has been missed?

(p.s. Great to see the DB provider field in the new question template!)

Check the docs before asking a question: https://docs.abp.io/en/commercial/latest/ Check the samples, to see the basic tasks: https://docs.abp.io/en/commercial/latest/samples/index The exact solution to your question may have been answered before, please use the search on the homepage.

• ABP Framework version: v4.0.0
• UI type: MVC
• Tiered (MVC) or Identity Server Seperated (Angular): yes
• Exception message and stack trace:
• Steps to reproduce the issue:

The role claims are not being saved as the UpdateClaimsAsync() method within the IdentityRoleAppService class is missing a await RoleRepository.UpdateAsync(role); at the end.

I was able to fix it by replacing the IdentityRoleAppService and appending the missing line in the overriden method.

• ABP Framework version: v4.0.1
• UI type: MVC
• Tiered (MVC) or Identity Server Seperated (Angular): yes
• Exception message and stack trace:

[15:06:22 ERR] Error occured while adding the module Volo.Identity.Prowith source-code to the solution "2ae0add0-a136-48b3-889f-e331d74b2f66".. System.InvalidOperationException: Sequence contains no matching element at System.Linq.ThrowHelper.ThrowNoMatchException() at System.Linq.Enumerable.First[TSource](IEnumerable1 source, Func2 predicate) at Volo.Abp.Cli.ProjectModification.SolutionModuleAdder.ChangeDomainTestReferenceToMongoDB(ModuleWithMastersInfo module, String moduleSolutionFile) in D:\github\abp\framework\src\Volo.Abp.Cli.Core\Volo\Abp\Cli\ProjectModification\SolutionModuleAdder.cs:line 201 at Volo.Abp.Cli.ProjectModification.SolutionModuleAdder.RemoveUnnecessaryProjectsAsync(String solutionDirectory, ModuleWithMastersInfo module, String[] projectFiles) in D:\github\abp\framework\src\Volo.Abp.Cli.Core\Volo\Abp\Cli\ProjectModification\SolutionModuleAdder.cs:line 151 at Volo.Abp.Cli.ProjectModification.SolutionModuleAdder.AddAsync(String solutionFile, String moduleName, String startupProject, String version, Boolean skipDbMigrations, Boolean withSourceCode, Boolean addSourceCodeToSolutionFile, Boolean newTemplate, Boolean newProTemplate) in D:\github\abp\framework\src\Volo.Abp.Cli.Core\Volo\Abp\Cli\ProjectModification\SolutionModuleAdder.cs:line 98 at Volo.Abp.Cli.Commands.AddModuleCommand.ExecuteAsync(CommandLineArgs commandLineArgs) in D:\github\abp\framework\src\Volo.Abp.Cli.Core\Volo\Abp\Cli\Commands\AddModuleCommand.cs:line 59 at Volo.Abp.Suite.Controllers.AbpSuiteController.AddModuleAsync(AddModuleInput input) [15:06:38 ERR] Error occured while adding the module Volo.Identity.Prowith source-code to the solution "2ae0add0-a136-48b3-889f-e331d74b2f66".. System.InvalidOperationException: Sequence contains no matching element at System.Linq.ThrowHelper.ThrowNoMatchException() at System.Linq.Enumerable.First[TSource](IEnumerable1 source, Func2 predicate) at Volo.Abp.Cli.ProjectModification.SolutionModuleAdder.ChangeDomainTestReferenceToMongoDB(ModuleWithMastersInfo module, String moduleSolutionFile) in D:\github\abp\framework\src\Volo.Abp.Cli.Core\Volo\Abp\Cli\ProjectModification\SolutionModuleAdder.cs:line 201 at Volo.Abp.Cli.ProjectModification.SolutionModuleAdder.RemoveUnnecessaryProjectsAsync(String solutionDirectory, ModuleWithMastersInfo module, String[] projectFiles) in D:\github\abp\framework\src\Volo.Abp.Cli.Core\Volo\Abp\Cli\ProjectModification\SolutionModuleAdder.cs:line 151 at Volo.Abp.Cli.ProjectModification.SolutionModuleAdder.AddAsync(String solutionFile, String moduleName, String startupProject, String version, Boolean skipDbMigrations, Boolean withSourceCode, Boolean addSourceCodeToSolutionFile, Boolean newTemplate, Boolean newProTemplate) in D:\github\abp\framework\src\Volo.Abp.Cli.Core\Volo\Abp\Cli\ProjectModification\SolutionModuleAdder.cs:line 98 at Volo.Abp.Cli.Commands.AddModuleCommand.ExecuteAsync(CommandLineArgs commandLineArgs) in D:\github\abp\framework\src\Volo.Abp.Cli.Core\Volo\Abp\Cli\Commands\AddModuleCommand.cs:line 59 at Volo.Abp.Suite.Controllers.AbpSuiteController.AddModuleAsync(AddModuleInput input)
[15:07:27 ERR] Error occured while adding the module Volo.AuditLogging.Uiwith source-code to the solution "2ae0add0-a136-48b3-889f-e331d74b2f66".. System.ArgumentNullException: Value cannot be null. (Parameter 'path') at System.IO.Path.GetFullPath(String path) at System.IO.DirectoryInfo..ctor(String path) at Volo.Abp.Cli.ProjectModification.SolutionModuleAdder.RemoveProjectByPostFix(ModuleWithMastersInfo module, String moduleSolutionFile, String targetFolder, String postFix) in D:\github\abp\framework\src\Volo.Abp.Cli.Core\Volo\Abp\Cli\ProjectModification\SolutionModuleAdder.cs:line 186 at Volo.Abp.Cli.ProjectModification.SolutionModuleAdder.RemoveUnnecessaryProjectsAsync(String solutionDirectory, ModuleWithMastersInfo module, String[] projectFiles) in D:\github\abp\framework\src\Volo.Abp.Cli.Core\Volo\Abp\Cli\ProjectModification\SolutionModuleAdder.cs:line 150 at Volo.Abp.Cli.ProjectModification.SolutionModuleAdder.AddAsync(String solutionFile, String moduleName, String startupProject, String version, Boolean skipDbMigrations, Boolean withSourceCode, Boolean addSourceCodeToSolutionFile, Boolean newTemplate, Boolean newProTemplate) in D:\github\abp\framework\src\Volo.Abp.Cli.Core\Volo\Abp\Cli\ProjectModification\SolutionModuleAdder.cs:line 98 at Volo.Abp.Cli.Commands.AddModuleCommand.ExecuteAsync(CommandLineArgs commandLineArgs) in D:\github\abp\framework\src\Volo.Abp.Cli.Core\Volo\Abp\Cli\Commands\AddModuleCommand.cs:line 59 at Volo.Abp.Suite.Controllers.AbpSuiteController.AddModuleAsync(AddModuleInput input)

• Steps to reproduce the issue:

I am using MongoDB

I tried to add the Identity and Audit Logging modules through the abp suite for an existing solution.

• ABP Framework version: v4.0.0
• UI type: MVC
• Tiered (MVC) or Identity Server Seperated (Angular): yes / no
• Exception message and stack trace:
• Steps to reproduce the issue:
• **Database: MongoDB

Hi,

I am implementing my own entity change tracking and am using MongoDB.

There is a bug, which means that the sorting is only being applied to the current page of entity change results. https://github.com/abpframework/abp/blob/f4c7def47a97c77e4fa2813f52e8ebe61598f095/modules/audit-logging/src/Volo.Abp.AuditLogging.MongoDB/Volo/Abp/AuditLogging/MongoDB/MongoAuditLogRepository.cs#L179

Paging should be performed after the sort, same as this line: https://github.com/abpframework/abp/blob/f4c7def47a97c77e4fa2813f52e8ebe61598f095/modules/audit-logging/src/Volo.Abp.AuditLogging.MongoDB/Volo/Abp/AuditLogging/MongoDB/MongoAuditLogRepository.cs#L58

Best regards,

Mike

• ABP Framework version: v4.0.0
• UI type: MVC
• Tiered (MVC) or Identity Server Seperated (Angular): yes
• Exception message and stack trace:
• Steps to reproduce the issue:

Hi,

I have been trying to get the entity auditing working, but then I found out through the documentation that it is not supported for MongoDB. https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Audit-Logging

Is there a reason that this has not yet been implemented for MongoDB? Can you let me know if this is planned to be supported? Can you let me know how I might go about implementing this myself?

Many thanks,

Mike

• ABP Framework version: c4.0.0
• UI type: MVC
• Tiered (MVC) or Identity Server Seperated (Angular): yes
• MongoDB
• Exception message and stack trace:
• Steps to reproduce the issue:

Hi,

The existing OU functionality allows us to define a hierarchy of OUs and then specify the users which are within the OUs. We are then able to define the roles for an OU, which results in those roles being applied to the users within the OU.

However, we have a requirement where we need to able to assign a role to a user, which should only give them the role permissions for the specific organizational units defined by the role.

The idea would be the following.

1. Be able to create a role and be able to indicate that it is a "Restricted Access" role (it would just be an extension of the existing role entity) and specify which organization units the role functionality is applicable to.

• it does not grant its permissions globally, but only for data within the specified organization units.
• Be able to choose which organization unit(s) the the role applies to
• The permissions enabled by the role will be limited to those that support restricted access (as it is up to the services / repositories to ensure that they can filter by OU).
• A user does not need to be in the orgnization unit to be assigned the role

2. Assign the role to user/organisation units/api clients in the usual way

• As it is a normal role (with some additional properties), this will mean that it will work for the usual role functionality and security checks within razor pages and services
• Within the services the data can be filtered and actions restricted so that they are ou specific

I have looked at all the existing documentation regarding organization units and looked at many existing software solutions to discover how it works from a users perspective and I believe the above design would work well.

I am wondering if you are planning to extend the OU functionality to include this feature in the future? Or anything similar? Is there already a request of backlog item for it?

If not, are you able to make any recommendations about how we should go about implementing this functionality?

My current thinking is

• Extend the permissions system to be able to define permissions as "Restricted Access"
  • This is needed because not all permissions will support filtering by OU
• Extend the role creation / editor
  • to be able to indicate that a role is "Restricted Access"
  • to be able to select the "Restricted Access" permissions which are enabled for the role
• Extend relative entities so that they can be included in an OU.
  • We might want to support entities existing in more thatn on OU
• Extend my services / repositories to do the required filtering
• Make the design flexible enough that we can override and extend existing modules to make the support the "Restricted Access" concept

I settled on the "Restricted Access" rather than "OU Specific" as I think "OU Specific" does not make it clear what its purpose is and can be confused with the existing ability to add roles to an OU. I also chose to extend permissions to be "Restricted Access" and to make a distinction between normal roles vs "Restricted Access" roles to make it clear what a user with the role will be able to do and there would be no confusion about if the user will have access to all data or only data associated with particular OUs.

Your help is greatly appreciated,

Mike

• ABP Framework version: v4.0.0 RC5
• UI type: MVC
• Tiered (MVC) or Identity Server Seperated (Angular): yes
• Exception message and stack trace:
• Steps to reproduce the issue:

When I try to move an organization unit to a different parent (e.g. move Production under Central)... I can see in the preview that I am requesting to move it where I want to

and the confirmation dialog is correct. However, after completion, it has not moved. This appears to be the case when trying to move organization units to any different level, including to the root level.

Mike